Thursday, 26 September 2013

Samsung SGH -M310

Samsung SGH -M310 offers good battery life and a high-quality processing of his case. Which additional features, the phone has , read the test .

Battery Life

Samsung SGH -M310
Up to 15 days , the clamshell phone from Samsung SGH -M310 is ready to receive . For intensive use ( write regular SMS , take pictures and make calls ) , the duration of 30 hours.

Features and functions

The enclosure is made quality. Nothing crunched or wiggling in the test. Samsung also performed well in the robustness tests. Our radiation index is low.

Screen and keyboard

The SGH -M310 has very large keys. Typed numbers and SMS messages received will appear on the display legibly size.

Music and Entertainment

The mobile phone has only four megabytes of memory , so the memory is just enough for one or two songs , MP3s also can not be used as a ringtone. Since the built-in radio clearly offers more variety.

Advantages
  • Long battery life
Disadvantages
  • Internet access program impractical
  • Poor photo quality
Specifications of Samsung SGH - M310
  • Product Type    Cellular Phone , Camera Phone
  • Clamshell design
  • Frequency band Quad band
  • Standby     -300.0 h
  • Talk time   - 4.0 hours
  • Proprietary  - Operating system
  • Display resolution - 160 x 128 pixels
  • Second display resolution - 96 x 96 pixels
  • Internal Memory - 4.0 MB
  • Camera resolution - 0.3 MP
  • No video calling
  • No mobile TV
  • Dual sim - no
  • Data transfer - GPRS, Bluetooth
  • Dimensions - 87 x 45 x 19 mm
  • Weight - 87.0 g
  • Audio feature  - Radio
  • MMS messaging
  • SAR value of 0.38 W / kg
Conclusion: Samsung SGH -M310

The clamshell Samsung SGH -M310 was the most expensive phone in the test. Its casing is made according to quality. Nothing crunched or wiggled . Samsung also performed well in the robustness tests. Other plus points : The SGH -M310 has very large keys. Typed numbers and SMS messages received will appear on the display legibly size. And : Radiation index is relatively low. The quality of the photos , however, is useless. »read more

No comments:

Post a Comment